Full citation – Référence complète:
Senegačnik, B. “The sweetness of spirit or song? On Pindar’s Pythian 6.52-54”. Živa Antika / Antiquité Vivante 75.1-2 (2025), pp. 5–16.

DOI: xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Download this article – Téléchargez cet article

Abstract. – The last verse of Pindar’s sixth ode (P. 6.54) has traditionally been understood as a praise of Thrasybulus’ generosity, his spirit, which surpasses honey in sweetness. Some more recent interpretations disagree, arguing that the verb ἀμείβεται cannot mean “surpass,” since there is no parallel for this in Greek poetry. Instead, they understand it as “requite” or “get in exchange”; this has broader implications: the expression μελισσᾶν… τρητὸν πόνον is thus supposed to denote a poem and refer to the ode in which it appears, i.e. P. 6, which the poet dedicates to Thrasybulus in gratitude. The traditional understanding, which is said to originate from the scholiast’s misunderstanding, is therefore impossible. Although this inter-pretation is well argued and a new reading is entirely possible, the question remains open. The article presents arguments that the verb ἀμείβεται can have the figurative meaning “to surpass” and that the traditional reading can therefore still be justified. It also presents possible arguments for the scholiast’s reading of the passage, which is not necessarily the result of a misunderstanding. If the poem was intended to be performed at a symposium, this has pragmatic implications for the new reading as well: in fragment 124ab (in a poem, which is probably an erotic encomium, addressed to Thrasybulus,) Pindar says that the purpose of his poem is to evoke, in synergy with wine, an ecstatic experience for all participants in Thrasybu-lus’ symposium, which would not be possible without the latter’s hospitality. So even if the last line of P. 6 means that Thrasybulus receives the poem as requite, this implies, in close connection with the previous two lines, praise for his exceptional generosity, the sweetness of his spirit (γλυκεῖα φρήν): it is the one that provides the pragmatic context for the performance, in which the poem can be actualized and prove itself to be a honeycomb,  “the perforated labor of bees”.